One of the differences in preparing a portfolio is that there is no attempt at thinking about "readers" in general or even in terms of classmates as peer reviewers. The audience for the portfolio is me. So it's appropriate that my last blog for this semester be a review of what I look for in the portfolios.
- How does the portfolio as a whole demonstrate the student writer has achieved the goals outlined in the course syllabus? This includes understanding how to: adapt your work to an audience; achieve a purpose with your writing; develop effective writing strategies that include invention, drafting and revising; be creative but use the appeals (logos, pathos, ethos); incorporate secondary research; work in groups; be able to critically read your own work and that of other writers.
- How does each piece of the portfolio demonstrate the skills listed above AND address the guidelines for the project?
- How does each item in the portfolio rank on the Writing Program rubric? In other words, I read each paper with the idea of assigning it a grade, but I don't just "average" the grades together. I consider the portfolio as a whole when assigning a grade.
Another option is to answer the question: How am I ready for ENG 104? Not that you can accomplish the goals for 104 yet, but are you ready to work toward these goals? Here is an overview of the goals of that course:
- Create and complete research projects using both primary and secondary research, and document the sources appropriately.
- Generate a research question that you are interested in investigating. Pick appropriate research methods to investigate.
- Employ critical thinking in evaluation, analysis and synthesis of research.
- Use a variety of strategies to gather and organize information to persuade your audience.
- Use the university library for research.
- Complete individual and joint research projects.